top of page

Bibliographies

The following sources are the most integral to my research on dog perception and cognition, and the development of my advocacy research on selective dog breeding. Here is a bit of information on each to help you get a better understanding of each source:

​

​

​

​

Espinosa, J. H. (2022). The physical world of the dog (Order No. 28963625). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2692014822). Retrieved from  https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/physical-world-dog/docview/2692014822/se-2

​

The article “The Physical World of the Dog” by Julia Espinosa, a researcher who studies behavior and cognition in dogs, was published by the University of Toronto (Canada) ProQuest Dissertations Publishing in  2022. In her study, treats were either hidden behind or placed under objects, like a cup, and each dog was tested on their ability to solve the task when knowing that a treat was not in direct view. It was found that dogs are almost equally as successful in finding a treat with a cup placed over it as when it was in direct view, while they struggled more when the cup was just placed in front of a treat to block it. This study gives us more information on how dogs perceive the world around them, and can teach us certain sensory advantages and disadvantages that dogs hold. Julia Espinosa led this article, but also assisted on the article ““Searching high and low: domestic dogs’ understanding of solidity,” which both address skills of perception and its application in dogs. This study is very similar to the other, but tests more of dog’s understanding of object permanence and how dogs can actually see the world.

 

​
 

Bray, E.E., Gruen, M.E., Gnanadesikan, G.E. et al. Dog cognitive development: a longitudinal study across the first 2 years of life. Anim Cogn 24, 311–328 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-020-01443-7

 

The article “Dog cognitive development: a longitudinal study across the first 2 years of life”  with contributions by Emily E. Bray, Margaret E. Gruen, Gitanjali E. Gnanadesikan, Daniel J. Horschler, Kerinne M. Levy, Brenda S. Kennedy, Brian A. Hare, and Evan L. MacLean, who all research cognition in animals, was published in 2020. A collection of dog cognitive development battery (DCDB) tasks were assigned to puppies earlier in life and to other older dogs. These tasks included retrievals, gesture use, odor control, memory, and perceptual tests, which research demonstrated that dogs were able to further master these types of tasks with age. This research article is imperative to the other point-in-time studies being conducted, as it demonstrates the development of cognition over time. This study was the first conducted in relation to the other two – it provides important context to understanding cognition in dogs and how it is strengthened over time. This article serves as a precursor to the other studies and tells researchers when dogs have developed into their full cognitive potential.

​


 

Espinosa, J., Tecwyn, E.C. & Buchsbaum, D. Searching high and low: domestic dogs’ understanding of solidity. Anim Cogn 25, 555–570 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01568-3

 

The article “Searching high and low: domestic dogs’ understanding of solidity” by Julia Espinosa, Emma C. Tecwyn and Daphna Buchsbaum, researchers of cognition and specifically cognition in animals, was published in 2021. This study tests dogs’ understanding of where a treat ends up when dropped, even if they cannot see where it landed. In this article, it was found that most of the time, dogs are capable of understanding where a treat was dropped behind a screen, and even with a shelf in the middle – they looked in the correct spot for the treat most of the time. This study demonstrates the intelligent nature of dogs to understand the effects of gravity and that the treat will still be there, even if they cannot see it. Julia Espinosa also led the research in “The physical world of the dog,” which serves as a complement to this study. Learning how dogs perceive the world is just as important as how they apply their perception to related skills.

Scicomm Article & Literature Review

Defining the Problem

 

Selba, M. C., Bryson, E. R., Rosenberg, C. L., Heng, H. G., & DeLeon, V. B. (2020). Selective breeding in domestic dogs: How selecting for a short face impacted canine neuroanatomy. The Anatomical Record, 304(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24471

 

The article “Selective breeding in domestic dogs: How selecting for a short face impacted canine neuroanatomy.” consists of research from Selba, Bryson, Rosenberg, and DeLeon who are all graduate students at the University of Florida, and Heng, a graduate student at Purdue University. All researchers are interested in the areas of  cranial morphology, comparative anatomy, evolution, facial reduction, selective breeding, and pedagogy. Their collective research, published in 2020, is the first of its kind, investigating how selecting smaller, “cuter”, faces in brachycephalic (shorter-faced) dogs impacts the anatomy of their brain through the analysis of endocasts – a type of internal cast created to assess the properties of the otherwise inaccessible space of the brain. The team generated these endocasts using CT scans, and utilized geometric morphometric analyses – or a quantitative method measuring the form of shape of a three-dimensional object. Four types of dog species were compared to an unidentified species. The researchers discovered that the shape of the endocast correlates with the cephalic index, meaning ​​a number obtained by taking the maximum width of the head of an organism, multiplying it by 100 and then dividing it by their maximum length. In other words, the researchers found that by selecting dog breeds with smaller faces, there was a visible effect on the shape of the endocast by the cephalic index. Researchers also found that the majority of the shape variance was associated with the dog’s olfactory anatomy, or the bodily structures that make up the sense of smell. This source will be useful in my own research and animal advocacy project because it provides the scientific reasoning as to why selective dog breeding is harmful. This study provides evidence that opting for more “preferable” features of dogs changes the shapes of their brains and thus affecting their capacity to live and function comfortably.

​

​

​

Pedigree dogs health problems | RSPCA - RSPCA - rspca.org.uk. (n.d.). RSPCA. https://www.rspca.org.uk/adviceandwelfare/pets/dogs/puppy/pedigreedogs/health

​

RSPCA, or Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, published an article called “Pedigree dogs health problems” in which they provide credible evidence that the welfare and quality of life of dogs is severely diminished when they are purebred or pedigree selected. RSPCA is a charity in England and Wales that promotes animal welfare. This article presents the specific features of dogs that are affected due to selective breeding, such as how flatter and smaller faces lead to breathing issues, bulging or sunken eyes cause pain or blindness, and floppy ears lead to ear infections and injury – they also prevent dogs from raising their ears to communicate with other dogs. Breeding for smaller bodies also causes smaller hips which make birth difficult and painful, while larger and heavier dogs suffer internal issues such as heart or joint problems. Dogs also develop other issues with their tails and skin, making life uncomfortable all around. This article also offers how you can help your dog if they have these features, and how to rescue a dog as opposed to supporting selective dog breeding. This article is concluded with two documents that give more comprehensive lists of inherited diseases and exaggerated features that result from selective dog breeding. Although the RSPCA is a charity, they are also a credible source as they strive to provide factual, up-to-date scientific information. They have an in-house science group, consisting of about 20 postgraduate and postdoctoral animal welfare scientists researching current issues about all animals. This source will be useful in my advocacy project because it touches more on the physical effects that dogs actually live with when they are selectively bred. Other articles I have selected provide a higher level of scientific research, but this source is just as important in describing more tangible effects.

​

(view the pdf files of the diseases and feature lists below, from the RSPCA website)

 

 

​
 

 

 

 

Akey, J. M., Ruhe, A. L., Akey, D. T., Wong, A. K., Connelly, C. F., Madeoy, J., Nicholas, T. J., & Neff, M. W. (2010). Tracking footprints of artificial selection in the dog genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(3), 1160–1165. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909918107

 

The study "Tracking Footprints of Artificial Selection in the Dog Genome" by Akey et al. (2020) researches the genetics behind the variety of traits we see in dog breeds. Researchers consist of notable professors from the Department of Genome Sciences at the University of Washington, Seattle, Center for Veterinary Genetics at UC Davis, Center for Canine Health and Performance, Translational Genomics Research Institute in Phoenix, AZ, and The Van Andel Research Institute in Grand Rapids, MI. Dogs have been shaped by humans through selective breeding for thousands of years, but the specific genetic changes responsible for this diversity were relatively unknown until recently. The study introduces how dogs are one of the species with the most variety on the planet, with over 400 distinct breeds, each with their own characteristics of fur, built, ect. from breeding. In this study, researchers scanned the genomes of 275 dogs from ten different breeds. They looked at over 21,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), or genetic markers. The scan identified 155 regions in the dog genomes that showed strong signs of selection, or areas where specific traits were favored. Some genes were linked to specific traits, which suggest that changes in gene regulation have greatly altered the variety of dog breeds seen today. This study provides the first detailed map of how selective dog breeding has shaped the genome of the dog. Knowing how these genomes have formed can help us to improve dog health by educating and promoting the dog breeding community on genetic diversity. This source will be useful to my personal project because this knowledge has practical applications in breeding and veterinary care needed as a result of selective breeding. Understanding a specific issue that dogs are facing is integral to the proper treatment and knowing how to avoid this problem potentially recurring.

Inherited Diseases Factsheet                          Exaggerated Features Factsheet

Solutions

Smith, D. (2024, April 10). L.A. City Council votes to stop issuing new dog breeding licenses  - Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-04-09/los-angeles-passes-breeding-license-moratorium-in-effort-to-help-animal-shelter-crisis

​

Dakota Smith, who covers the city hall for the Los Angeles times newspaper, published an article on April 9, 2024, covering the decision made by the committee that oversees the city’s Animal Services Department to stop issuing new dog breeding licenses as long as the shelters remain overcrowded. The shelters currently remain at a 200% capacity. The American Kennel Club, a non-profit pro-breeding organization, opposes this ban, stating that blaming registered breeders will not improve conditions for dogs in crowded shelters. However, Smith presents anecdotal evidence that suggests that the majority of people who purchase licenses from the city aren’t breeding their dogs, said Staycee Dains, the Animal Services Department’s general manager. The issue seems to be many dog owners who buy a $235 city breeder permit so that they do not have to spay or neuter their dogs. Los Angeles does not regulate breeders, and underground, unlicensed breeders remain a problem. Council members say this is “far from the only action” needed to address this issue, but it is the beginning of a movement. This article from the Los Angeles Times provides a smaller-scale global solution to the issue of selective dog breeding. By continuing to enact legislation that prevents legal breeding, we can make a step in the right direction and work towards the issue of illegal, underground breeding.

​

​
 

Puppy Protection Act brings hope for dogs languishing in puppy mills. (2023, March 20). The Humane Society of the United States. https://www.humanesociety.org/blog/puppy-protection-act-brings-hope-dogs-languishing-puppy-mills

 

Kitty Block, the CEO of the Humane Society of the United States, and Sara Amundson, the chief government relations officer for the Humane Society published an article in March 2023 explaining proposed legislation that “brings hope for dogs languished in puppy mills.” The United States Humane Society is a non-profit organization that focuses on animal welfare and opposes animal-related cruelties of national scope. Many of these dogs that suffer their whole lives in puppy mills are born as a result of selective breeding. In 2021, The United States Senate Introduced the “Puppy Protection Act of 2021”, which sought to amend the Animal Welfare Act to enhance the welfare of breeding dogs and their puppies. This legislation was proposed to address various issues in commercial dog breeding, such as the harmful genetic effects, inherited diseases, living conditions, regulated veterinary care, and increased exercise requirements for dogs in breeding facilities. Three years later, the bill has not yet come into law, but most recently it was referred  to the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry (Senate - Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry). If this act is put into law, it could potentially improve and bring up the ethical levels that dog breeding facilities currently hold. This act provides a national regulation that serves as an option for a global solution. The organization urges readers to ask their representatives to cosponsor the Puppy Protection Act. 



 

PETA’s “Global Beauty Without Bunnies” program | PETA. (2023, February 24). PETA. https://www.peta.org/living/personal-care-fashion/beauty-without-bunnies/

 

PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, is a national non-profit organization that advocates for the better treatment of animals in laboratories, and the food, entertainment, and clothing industries. The organization has levels of certifications that companies can reach, highlighting if a company is cruelty free, and even vegan. When companies reach this free certification, they can pay a one-time $350 licensing fee to use the bunny logo, attesting to the fact that their company does not test on animals. PETA even has a database on their website at which you can search for your favorite or most used brands to see if they are cruelty free. 

The next time you go to buy something, you can do your research before you support companies that test on animals by visiting PETA’s website https://crueltyfree.peta.org/ to check if a company or product tests on animals. Resources like PETA’s website aim to increase education about these practices that have become hidden, yet become an increasingly larger issue in our society. By making minor changes to your lifestyle to stop supporting brands that test on animals, you can help to reduce the demand for items manufactured with testing on animals, and driving down the market for selectively bred testing dogs.

bottom of page